Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "RT/meetings/PMC Minutes 130220"
(New page: == Attendees == == Agenda ==) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Attendees == | == Attendees == | ||
| + | * Markus (RAP) | ||
| + | * Jesse | ||
| + | * Ian | ||
| + | * Christian | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| + | * RAP 2.0, working on RAP 2.1 for Kepler | ||
| + | * Moderator, Dave is likely to moderate. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Discussions for Panel == | ||
| + | * Most important question: is the Eclipse Runtime Project failing the community by not providing an expected completely integrated stack of software for building applications on, or is it just a useful organizational construct for projects that would otherwise have no home under the existing Eclipse structure? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Planning Council == | ||
| + | * Next year release name is Luna, going through legal now | ||
| + | * IP CQ deadline for Kepler has passed | ||
Latest revision as of 10:23, 20 February 2013
Attendees
- Markus (RAP)
- Jesse
- Ian
- Christian
Agenda
- RAP 2.0, working on RAP 2.1 for Kepler
- Moderator, Dave is likely to moderate.
Discussions for Panel
- Most important question: is the Eclipse Runtime Project failing the community by not providing an expected completely integrated stack of software for building applications on, or is it just a useful organizational construct for projects that would otherwise have no home under the existing Eclipse structure?
Planning Council
- Next year release name is Luna, going through legal now
- IP CQ deadline for Kepler has passed