|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | = Feb 1, 2017 (WG Call)=
| |
| | | | |
| − | == Participants ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *Dan Gross, Samsung
| |
| − | *James Sutton, IBM
| |
| − | *David Bericat, Red Hat
| |
| − | *Laurent Lagosanto, MicroEJ
| |
| − | *Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
| |
| − | *Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
| |
| − | *Brad Micklea, Codenvy
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Agenda ==
| |
| − | === Eclipse IoT Testbeds: review strategy and next steps. ===
| |
| − | Work on a set of industry oriented (vertical solutions) to showcase a technical solution and showcase the Eclipse projects and vendor ecosystem.
| |
| − | Eclipse IoT Members working together to set-up the testbed and create a demo that runs 24/7 on the Eclipse servers
| |
| − | More details: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nmdi-cmw_O-7W2qZKRHMN-3gw0WHxE75llcV0nMhS-U/edit?usp=sharing
| |
| − | Proposed Testbed scenario around Asset Tracking Management: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1KF7yxv5Dnk6b2a574HPtU5pHR5q7wvsT4skKjGDz1Q4/edit?usp=sharing
| |
| − | There are many options for collaboration
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *Dan Gross: Samsung interested in participating - Kura gateway using ARTIK.
| |
| − | *Laurent Lagosanto: Potential use case for Eclipse Edje.
| |
| − | *David Bericat: Excited and look forward to working with everyone.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''Next Steps''': Stay tuned, we will be updating the group at large and scheduling individual meetings.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === 2. MQTT 5: Update from Ian Craggs / James Sutton on what’s in MQTT 5 and the expected impact on Eclipse Paho / Mosquitto and downstream adopters. ===
| |
| − | Big set of changes
| |
| − | Share description
| |
| − | Any request sent (and reply received) can have embedded metadata
| |
| − | This will be used for e.g letting a publisher know about *what* happened to the packet in addition to just acknowledging it
| |
| − | The CONNECT packet can contain information regarding what QoS are supported by the server
| |
| − | Supporting QoS 2 on the server is not mandatory anymore
| |
| − | Scalability
| |
| − | It will affect the Paho client and so a new Paho client will be created.
| |
| − | Improve API
| |
| − | Feedback from community
| |
| − | Work nicely with the new MQTT 5 features
| |
| − | The complete move will take a while, MQTT 3 will not go away anytime soon. It will be a parallel process. The previous versions of the client will be maintained. Some users might choose to use MQTT 3 since it’s more lightweight.
| |
| − | The adopters/compagnies
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''IMPORTANT:''' Get your feedback in as soon as possible, because in a few months it will be finalized, so review the specifications. View working draft 10 dated January 4: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/documents.php?num_per_wg=10&wg_abbrev=mqtt
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === 3. PMC topics: project documentation, build machines, Docker, … ===
| |
| − | Skipped this item - not enough PMC members on the call
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === 4. Misc. updates: ===
| |
| − | *WG Meeting at the Eclipse IoT Day San Jose Add your project for project update or intro: https://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseIoT_SanJose2017
| |
| − | *IoT Developer Survey Test it and give us feedback! It will go live next week. https://www.surveymonkey.net/r/Preview/?sm=PpPJLkX2kyFIkd4FpbfnijKgtSau8CTbzClUcIqMOv8UHpkGU6kxWrpBNJfYHpzC
| |
| − | *Member companies are encouraged to ask for a special link that they can use to promote the survey to their communities, and have access to answers based on this segment.
| |
| − | Open IoT Challenge: we will schedule a live hangout for project leads to answer any technical questions the participant may have. https://iot.eclipse.org/open-iot-challenge/
| |
