Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Search results

Page title matches

  • ...nt and dissemination. It also has to provide some means to ''improve'' the maturity. ...lambic] dashboard for the [http://dashboard.polarsys.org PolarSys maturity assessment].
    6 KB (762 words) - 04:21, 4 January 2016

Page text matches

  • **Benoit Langlois proposes to keep a simple approach based on maturity-oriented bundles (experimental, core, etc.). **gPM instance for Quality Assessment Infratool. Based on UPV domain model. WiP. Some future developments: integr
    8 KB (1,213 words) - 12:48, 7 August 2012
  • ...ng the whole life-cycle of the product, those Software users need maturity assessment and long lasting support for their tooling. ...we will describe how we implement such long term availability and maturity assessment for Eclipse tools.)
    4 KB (698 words) - 08:49, 1 June 2012
  • ...se_Unconference_Europe_2014#PolarSys_Maturity_Assessment PolarSys maturity assessment]
    16 KB (2,349 words) - 17:55, 27 October 2016
  • ...between academics and industrial partners in these domains and manage the maturity of tools from early research prototypes to the obsolescence of tools. * Create a labelling process to recognize projects maturity and companies know-how and commitment .
    5 KB (776 words) - 09:52, 3 October 2011
  • ...c process, such as VLTS release engineering, Quality Assurance or maturity assessment. This layer extends the Eclipse infrastructure which provides standard serv * Assessment and publication of the component's maturity
    8 KB (1,141 words) - 23:29, 11 September 2012
  • ...er the [https://polarsys.org/wiki/Maturity_Assessment_WG PolarSys Maturity Assessment], as the analysis process relies on code metrics extracted by SonarQube.
    5 KB (789 words) - 07:17, 16 May 2022
  • * Progress on Maturity Assessment ...quirements, but don't? What's the maturity of these projects? What's the maturity of these projects? Industry Success stories are welcome here!
    18 KB (2,741 words) - 10:06, 17 June 2014
  • * PolarSys maturity assessment
    14 KB (1,945 words) - 08:40, 23 June 2015
  • ...se_Unconference_Europe_2014#PolarSys_Maturity_Assessment PolarSys maturity assessment] == PolarSys Maturity Assessment ==
    17 KB (2,532 words) - 10:38, 12 November 2014
  • ...se_Unconference_Europe_2014#PolarSys_Maturity_Assessment PolarSys maturity assessment]
    13 KB (1,883 words) - 17:59, 16 November 2015
  • [[File:Maturity assessment architecture.jpg|center]] ...project. In the context of embedded software, this is often assimilated to Maturity."
    9 KB (1,240 words) - 05:12, 26 May 2015
  • * [[Maturity_Assessment_WG|Maturity assessment]]
    2 KB (209 words) - 10:30, 20 February 2018
  • ...nt and dissemination. It also has to provide some means to ''improve'' the maturity. ...lambic] dashboard for the [http://dashboard.polarsys.org PolarSys maturity assessment].
    6 KB (762 words) - 04:21, 4 January 2016
  • ...ment, this working group is mixed with the [[MaturityAssessmentWG|Maturity assessment]]. Specific information are nevertheless available on this page. ...database and a web interface. It will also host and publish the results of maturity assessments.
    1 KB (187 words) - 10:32, 12 June 2014
  • ==Maturity assessment== ...Eclipse and PolarSys. Please review and comment it: [[MaturityDefinition | Maturity Definition]]
    4 KB (555 words) - 08:04, 10 September 2013
  • We use the following quality model for the assessment of project maturity. It should be stressed that this model has been intensively discussed with ** '''Configuration Management''': the degree of maturity of software configuration management usage.
    10 KB (1,531 words) - 12:28, 10 March 2015
  • ** '''Maturity''': The capability of the software product to avoid failure as a result of The Eclipse development process defines maturity phases for projects with associated quality constraints. The more advanced
    9 KB (1,236 words) - 11:11, 6 June 2014
  • **Benoit Langlois proposes to keep a simple approach based on maturity-oriented bundles (experimental, core, etc.). **gPM instance for Quality Assessment Infratool. Based on UPV domain model. WiP. Some future developments: integr
    8 KB (1,220 words) - 08:26, 10 September 2013
  • ** Maturity Assessment Working Group ==Maturity Assessment Working Group==
    3 KB (413 words) - 11:56, 28 October 2013
  • ...here the group agreed on a [[EclipseQualityModel|quality model]] to assess maturity. This model defines three major components (Product, Process, Community), w * Integration of quality assessment results in the Bitergia dashboard
    4 KB (549 words) - 05:42, 1 August 2014

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Back to the top